Where the People and Friends of Africa Mingle

Has the United State Peace Corps Lost its Relevance?

Peace Corps LogoSince the inception of the Peace Corps by the United State government in 1961, hundreds of thousand of people have served as Peace Corps volunteers worldwide. Volunteers are typically fresh college graduates.

The former Peace Corps director in Cameroon. Robert Strauss writes via New York Times, why this needs to change, stating “what the agency should begin doing is recruiting only the best of recent graduates — as the top professional schools do — and only those older people whose skills and personal characteristics are a solid fit for the needs of the host country…I observed how many older volunteers brought something to their service that most young volunteers could not: extensive professional and life experience and the ability to mentor younger volunteers.”

In Cameroon, we had many volunteers sent to serve in the agriculture program whose only experience was puttering around in their mom and dad’s backyard during high school. I wrote to our headquarters in Washington to ask if anyone had considered how an American farmer would feel if a fresh-out-of-college Cameroonian with a liberal arts degree who had occasionally visited Grandma’s cassava plot were sent to Iowa to consult on pig-raising techniques learned in a three-month crash course. I’m pretty sure the American farmer would see it as a publicity stunt and a bunch of hooey, but I never heard back from headquarters.

For the Peace Corps, the number of volunteers has always trumped the quality of their work, perhaps because the agency fears that an objective assessment of its impact would reveal that while volunteers generate good will for the United States, they do little or nothing to actually aid development in poor countries. The agency has no comprehensive system for self-evaluation, but rather relies heavily on personal anecdote to demonstrate its worth.

Every few years, the agency polls its volunteers, but in my experience it does not systematically ask the people it is supposedly helping what they think the volunteers have achieved. This is a clear indication of how the Peace Corps neglects its customers; as long as the volunteers are enjoying themselves, it doesn’t matter whether they improve the quality of life in the host countries. Any well-run organization must know what its customers want and then deliver the goods, but this is something the Peace Corps has never learned.

Read full text: United States Peace Corps - Too Many Innocents Abroad, then leave your comment!

These posts may have related contents:

Site Tags: , , , ,

4 comment(s)

  1. pamela stitch | Jan 10, 2008 | Reply

    Oh pls, give me a break!!

    All, I will say to this is that the young must surely be allowed to grow.

    Yes,older professionals (most of them retired) do bring in a wealth of experience but younger people bring in new and fresher eyes to old problems.

    There is a need for balance.

  2. CareTaker | Jan 10, 2008 | Reply

    Pam: I don’t think the article is about not allowing “the young to grow”, it’s about “what a fresh US graduate brings to the table in a remote country”…as the example in Cameroon reveals.

  3. pamela stitch | Jan 10, 2008 | Reply

    Which is a ” younger people [fresh graduates]bring in new and fresher eyes to old problems. “

  4. John | Jan 11, 2008 | Reply

    The important point in this debate isn’t age; it’s about the quality of work the Peace Corps is doing. Like so many other development organizations, it appears Peace Corps feels that program evaluation is not very important. So, how do they know what works in the field or not? The question I’ve always had for development organizations like Peace Corps: What’s the end point here? What are your goals for the countries you work in? When will you honestly be able to say ‘our work here is finished’?

    Until most international development organizations get a better grip on assessing the value of their work, it seems organizations like the Peace Corps are just buying goodwill and throwing money into the wind.

Post a comment